State v. Tibbetts
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
2Per curiam
It is contended on rehearing that the statute is void for uncertainty, in that the word “locality” must have in its practical application a relative and variable meaning, so indefinite that it is impossible to determine how much territory is or should be embraced by the phrase “in the locality where the work is performed.”
The word “locality,” considered in a common-sense way with the context and the purpose of the act, is no more difficult of construction than multitudes of other words and phrases upheld by the courts in the administration of criminal law. There are many legal…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Town of Grove v. Haskell, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Street v. Varney Electrical Supply Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Hart v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Babcock v. HahnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.