Fisher v. Weinholzer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Orr, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
LOVELY, J.2
Action to recover for injuries sustained from an attack of a vicious dog owned by defendants, and permitted to run at large in their building, with knowledge of its alleged propensities to bite mankind. Plaintiff had a verdict. This appeal is from an order overruling a motion for a new trial.
Defendants were the proprietors of a saloon in St. Paul, in connection with which entertainments were given for the attraction of patrons. Plaintiff was employed by the defendant and others in the vicinity to watch their premises during the nighttime.. Between one and two *23o’clock on the morning…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Martin v. Walter CourtneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Witzel v. ZuelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
3Cited by6 opinions
- New York Central Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Smith v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Reese v. Ross & Ross Auctioneers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. ZecherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Torres v. RosenbaumNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.