Legal Opinion

Marcavage v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 14, 2006No. 06 C 3858PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Numerous plaintiffs — Michael Marea-vage (“Marcavage”), James Deferio (“De-ferio”), Faith Deferio, Craig Scarberry and Ryan Murphy (“Murphy”) — have filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against the City of Chicago (“Chicago”), the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority (“Authority”) and several Chicago Police Officers in their official and individual capacities, charging each with violations of plaintiffs’ constitutionally or statutorily protected civil rights. For its part, Chicago has moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rules”)…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. CHICAGO UNITED INDUSTRIES, LTD. v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API