Nelson v. State

This appeal presents the questions of the legal sufficiency of an information purporting to charge the uttering of a forged instrument under the provisions of section 28-601, R. R. S. 1943, and whether that question may be raised in this court for the first time on appeal.

We herein refer to the plaintiff in error as defendant, and to the defendant in error as the State.

The information charged that defendant “did, with the intent to defraud, utter, or publish as 'true and genuine, a false, forged, and counterfeited check for the payment of money, which bank check was of the following tenor, to…