Legal Opinion

Law v. Zuckerman

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 27, 2004No. CIV.A. CBD-01-1429PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFF’S ORAL MOTION TO PRECLUDE DEFENSE COUNSEL FROM CONDUCTING EX PARTE INTERVIEWS WITH PLAINTIFF’S TREATING PHYSICIAN

DAY, United States Magistrate Judge.

The Court is faced with an apparent issue of first impression in the Fourth Circuit in this medical malpractice action. The question presented is whether adverse counsel’s ex parte discussions with a treating physician regarding the scope of the physician’s care violates the Health Insurance and Portability Accountability Act of 1996, 42 U.S.C. 1320d et seq. (“HIPAA”). The Court finds that in the absence of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zachair, Ltd. v. DriggsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
  2. A HELPING HAND, LLC v. Baltimore County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
  3. Camden v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  4. Ngo v. Standard Tools & Equipment, Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
  5. Butler-Tulio v. ScrogginsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Mezu v. Morgan State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  2. State ex rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Bayne v. ProvostDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
  4. Crenshaw v. Mony Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2004
  5. Holman v. RasakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API