Legal Opinion

Lloyd's of London v. Fidelity Securities Corp.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1958No. 1 Div. 757PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

This appeal comes from a nonjury trial in the Mobile Circuit Court with judgment against Lloyd’s of London for $495.58.

The action is on a “nonrecording” policy, 1 wherein certain underwriters at Lloyd’s (appellant) undertook to indemnify Fidelity (appellee) against “any loss direct” which it might sustain “only insofar as [Fidelity would be] damaged through being prevented from” (a) obtaining possession, or (b) enforcing its rights (or both) with respect to property covered by a chattel mortgage or a conditional sales contract “solely as the result of the failure of [Fidelity]…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Burroughs Adding MacHine Co. v. WieselbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Wiggins v. Stewart Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. McKay v. Trusco Finance Co., of Montgomery, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. W. E. Daniel and E. A. Dillard v. The First National Bank of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
  5. W. E. Daniel and E. A. Dillard v. The First National Bank of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Trauner v. LowreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Automotive Acceptance Corporation v. PowellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  3. McCulley v. StroudSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Jones Valley Finance Co. v. TennilleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Sharpe v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (In Re Sharpe)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API