Legal Opinion
Kirkpatrick v. New York
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 23, 1973No. 73-104PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from Ct. App. N. Y. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., *949dissenting)), would note probable jurisdiction in this case and reverse judgment of conviction.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. LeyvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- People v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. BertinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. MorganCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.