Legal Opinion
Lamb v. Lehmann
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1924No. 18172PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.
This was originally an application for the direction and judgment of the court as to the proper administration of the trust imposed by the will of Mrs. Heady, and for an interpretation of the trust provisions respecting 204 shares of so-called dividend stock which came into the possession of the trustee after the death of testatrix.
The rights of the respective claimants to that property are controlled and must be determined by the intent of the testatrix. Being the owner will full power of disposition she gave the “income” to Mrs. Lamb during her lifetime, reserving the corpus to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Tax Commissioner v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Minot v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hayes v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Norvell EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Johnson v. LamprechtOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Holmes, Trustee v. HrobonOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
- Sherman v. ShermanOhio Supreme Court · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.