Legal Opinion

State v. Doyle

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 22, 1985No. 83-224PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, C.J.

In September and October of 1981, grand juries in Rockingham and Strafford Counties returned indictments against the defendants and others for violations of the Controlled Drug Act, RSA chapter 318-B. These charges arose out of a State police investigation, conducted in part by the use of wiretaps. The defendants moved to suppress the evidence obtained against them by means of the wiretaps.

The superior court consolidated the cases for a suppression hearing, which was specially scheduled for January 24, 1983, in Strafford County. Following the four-day hearing, the Trial Court (Dunn, J.)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. State v. ChaissonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. State v. ChaissonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ValenzuelaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. State v. BradberrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  4. State v. SternSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  5. State v. CoreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API