Legal Opinion

Padro Octaviani v. GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided March 6, 2017No. Civil No. 14-1900 (DRD)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, United States District Judge

Mari Estela Padro Octaviani (“Plaintiff’) brought an action against her employer GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare (“GSK”). Plaintiff alleges that she was unjustly dismissed by GSK pursuant to 29 P.R. Laws § 185a (“Law 80”). See Docket No. 6-1 (certified translation of complaint). Plaintiff additionally asserts that she was terminated illegally because of her age and in retaliation for her submission of a statement. The statement was submitted at the request of her employer and contained her version of facts of the events…

2Cases cited29 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Colon-Gonzalez v. Commonwealth of Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024