Mathews v. Toogood
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Saline county. Tried below before Morris, J. 2 Daniels Neg. Inst., Sec. 1513, Genoa v. Woodruff, 92 U. S., 502. Auroia v. West, 7 Wall., 105. Arents v. 'Commonwealth; 18 Gratt., 776. Mills v. Jefferson, 20 Wis., 50. Antonio v. Lane, 32 Tex., 405.
1Opinion of the Court
Reese, Ch. J.
The original action in this case was instituted in the district court of Saline county, for the purpose of foreclosing a mortgage given to secure a promissory note for $4,400, dated May 2, 1885, and due May 2, 1887, with interest from date, at the rate of ten per cent per annum, payable semi-annually, as per coupons attached to the note. There is one interest coupon remaining attached to the note, which is as follows:
“$220.00. May 2d, 1887,
We promise to pay to Luther P. Mathews, or order, Two Hundred and Twenty Dollars, being interest to that date on my note of $4,400. This…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Aurora City v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- County Commissioners v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1869
- Russell v. Smith ex rel. PrinceTennessee Supreme Court · 1848
- State of Connecticut v.JacksonNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Stewart v. . PetreeNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sanford v. LundquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- Steen v. StretchNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Lewis Investment Co. v. BoydNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Richardson v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court · 1889