Legal Opinion

CITY & CTY. OF HONOLULU v. Manoa Inv. Co.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1980No. 6180PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by Defendant Manoa Investment Company, Inc. from the Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment in an eminent domain proceeding brought by the City and County of Honolulu as plaintiff, awarding the sum of $1.00 as just compensation for the taking of a road easement identified as Parcel 19 in the Complaint.

Parcel 19 was owned by Defendant Manoa Investment Company, Inc., who succeeded Hirotoshi Yamamoto in ownership of the interest in Parcel 19. The City and County Master Plan, approved on July 9, 1942, and amended by Resolution 525 on November 13, 1953, set aside Parcel 19 as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Guardianship of Tadashi MatsuokaHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Bank of Hawaii v. CharHawaii Supreme Court · 1959
  3. City & County of Honolulu v. Boulevard Properties, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  4. City and County of Honolulu v. PlewsHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  5. In re YamaguchiHawaii Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mizoguchi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Wah Tim Chock v. BittermanHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Bloudell v. Wailuku Sugar Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. City of Honolulu v. WongHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API