Legal Opinion

Santa Clara County Department of Family & Children's Services v. Brenda B.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1994No. H011538Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, Acting P. J.

After Brenda B.’s parental rights to her daughter Krystle D. were terminated, she and her former husband, Krystle’s former *1786stepfather, John U., separately appeal. Brenda asserts that the proceedings were defective for lack of proper notice to her tribe under the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 United States Code section 1901 et seq. (hereafter, the Act). John contends that the court erred in denying him standing and de facto parent status.

Facts

Krystle was born on February 1, 1987, to Brenda, who became an enrolled member of the Kodiak Area Native Association (hereafter,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re BGCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  5. In Re Junious M.California Court of Appeal · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API