Legal Opinion

United States v. Lawrence Janiec, in No. 71-2149. Appeal of Samuel Laytham, in No. 71-2027

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 14, 1972No. 71-2027 and 71-2149PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MAX ROSENN, Circuit Judge.

This case raises squarely the long standing and often debated issue of disclosure of presentence investigation reports to a defendant, his attorney and the attorney for the Government.

Appellants, Janiee and Laytham were indicted on two counts: bank robbery and putting lives in jeopardy during that robbery by use of a dangerous weapon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d). After plea negotiations, they pled guilty to one count, and the remaining count was dismissed on motion of the Government.

Appellants were sentenced on July 30, 1971, in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Eliseo Espinoza, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Steven Max SafirsteinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. James Bass, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Wesley Clyde BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. Edward Eugene Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API