Legal Opinion

Miranda v. Fridman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 21, 1994PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

276 N.J. Super. 20 (1994)

647 A.2d 167

JUSTO A. MIRANDA AND MARTHA MIRANDA, MANUEL ARAUJO AND MARTHA ARAUJO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

SHULIM FRIDMAN, RICHARD E. WALLINGFORD, SHORTLINE TERMINAL, INC. A/K/A SHORTLINE TERMINAL AGENCY, INC., HUDSON TRANSIT LINES, CORP., HUDSON TRANSIT LINES, INC. AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT. SHORTLINE TERMINAL AGENCY, INC., HUDSON TRANSIT LINES AND RICHARD WALLINGFORD, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

HYUNDAI GROUP, HYUNDAI CORPORATION, HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY, PARAGON…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hyundai Motor Co. v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wilson v. PleasantIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Cellucci v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Cooper v. General Motors Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Talalai v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API