Legal Opinion

Hyundai Motor Co. v. Alvarado

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1998No. 95-0969PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpector, Justice

in which GONZALEZ, BAKER, ABBOTT and HANKINSON, Justices, join.

Congress passed the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 “to reduce traffic accidents and deaths and injuries to persons resulting from traffic accidents.” 15 U.S.C. § 13811 (recodified at 49 U.S.C. § 30101). The issue before us is whether the Act and its implementing regulations preempt common-law claims asserting that a vehicle’s passenger restraint system was defectively designed because the manufacturer failed to install lap belts. The court of appeals concluded that these claims were not preempted. 908 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Ltd. Partnership v. Pascouet, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  2. Great Dane Trailers, Inc. v. Estate of WellsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Stier v. Reading & Bates Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Tenet Hospitals Ltd. v. Boada, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
  5. Campbell v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API