Berkowitz v. Mayflower Securities, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
*536Dissenting Opinion By
Mr. Justice Roberts:
At a moment in our jurisprudence when society expects the highest degree of integrity of those holding positions of public trust and confidence,1 it is shocking indeed to witness a licensed securities dealer abuse its position of trust. In my view, this Court unwisely chooses to approve the lawless conduct of Mayflower Securities. I dissent from the majority’s failure to condemn Mayflower’s resort to self-help.
The pertinent facts are undisputed. Mayflower, the sole underwriter of a new issue of 3i Company, received from appellant an indication of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Seaboard Industries, Inc. v. MonacoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Fleming's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Austen v. MarzolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Setlock v. SutilaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.