Legal Opinion · Dissent

Berkowitz v. Mayflower Securities, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1974No. Appeal, 168Published

1Dissent

*536Dissenting Opinion By

Mr. Justice Roberts:

At a moment in our jurisprudence when society expects the highest degree of integrity of those holding positions of public trust and confidence,1 it is shocking indeed to witness a licensed securities dealer abuse its position of trust. In my view, this Court unwisely chooses to approve the lawless conduct of Mayflower Securities. I dissent from the majority’s failure to condemn Mayflower’s resort to self-help.

The pertinent facts are undisputed. Mayflower, the sole underwriter of a new issue of 3i Company, received from appellant an indication of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Seaboard Industries, Inc. v. MonacoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Fleming's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Austen v. MarzolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Setlock v. SutilaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API