Setlock v. Sutila
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
We are here asked to determine whether equity was the proper form of action for appellants’ bill of complaint. We believe an adequate remedy at law exists but hold that the Court of Common Pleas of Indiana County was in error in sustaining preliminary objections without certifying the matter to the law side of the court.
On June 4, 1970, appellants Mike and Flora Setloek filed a bill in equity alleging the following. On April 1,1964, they purchased a motel and a surrounding tract of land from Joseph J. Sutila for a total of $175,000. The money was to be raised by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Meehan v. Cheltenham TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Wilson v. King of Prussia Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Fleming's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Siegel v. EngstromSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Holiday Lounge, Inc. v. Shaler Enterprises Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- D'AMBROSIO v. Pa. Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Klemow v. Time IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Pekular v. EichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Meier v. MaleskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Lisa H. v. State Board of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.