Legal Opinion

United States v. Luis Ramirez, Leopoldo Alegria-Valencia, Antonio G. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 13, 1987No. 86-3264PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

Appellants, Luis Ramirez, Leopoldo Al-egría-Valencia, and Antonio G. Rodriguez were convicted following a jury trial for various violations of the Federal Controlled Substances Act. Alegría, and possibly Rodriguez, challenge the Drug Enforcement Agency’s (“DEA”) search of luggage and other items which were left in an abandoned hotel room. Ramirez urges that a Brady 1 violation occurred. All three appellants question the sufficiency of the evidence and the failure of the district court to give certain jury instructions. We affirm.

Gabriel Quadri, a paid government…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. People v. ParsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. United States v. Richard Samuel HuffhinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. WhittenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Moberg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API