Magowan v. Magowan
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Edgar J. Nathan, Jr., J.
Motion by plaintiff in a matrimonial action to compel acceptance of an unverified reply is granted (Civ. Prac. Act, § 248). The answer asserts in an affirmative defense and a counterclaim the invalidity of plaintiff’s foreign divorce from her prior husband.
Testimony by plaintiff with respect to the allegations of the answer might reasonably be claimed by her to be privileged as possibly furnishing the means of convicting her of adultery in this State (Penal Law, art. 8). Accordingly she should not be required to verify her reply, irrespective of the contents thereof.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Matter of Peck v. . CargillNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Thompson v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Southbridge Finishing Co. v. GoldingNew York Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mahne v. MahneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Mahne v. MahneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Webb v. RosenstielNew York Supreme Court · 1970