Legal Opinion
City of Rochester v. Holmsten Ice Rinks, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1989No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff (City) commenced this action for damages resulting from the faulty design and construction of an ice-skating rink at Genesee Valley Park. The City sued defendants Holmsten Ice Rinks, Inc. (Holmsten), the prime contractor, and Corgan and Balestiere, P. C. (Corgan), the architect. Defendants impleaded third-party defendants Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co., Inc. (Ciminelli), a subcontractor which poured the concrete, and Sear-Brown Associates, P. C. (Sear-Brown), the consulting engineer. The ice rink was built between 1976 and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Board of Education v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & FolleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Lippes v. Atlantic BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Getlan v. Hofstra UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Banks v. DeMilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by10 opinions
- GENESEE/WYOMING YMCA v. BOVIS LEND LEASE LMB, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Edgewater Construction Co. v. 81 & 3 of Watertown, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Caleb v. Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Wax NJ-2, LLC v. JFB Construction & DevelopmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- County of Chautauqua v. Pacos Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.