Legal Opinion
Benenson v. Board of Representatives of Stamford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 12, 1992No. 14486; 14489PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
The principal issue in these appeals is whether the president of the board of representatives *779of the city of Stamford (board) correctly framed the question for the board’s vote on a proposed amendment to the zoning regulations of the city of Stamford. During the seven years of litigation involving these cases, this is the second time the parties have been before this court regarding the board’s action on this amendment to the regulations. See Stamford Ridgeway Associates v. Board of Representatives, 214 Conn. 407, 572 A.2d 951 (1990).1 The president of the board, Sandra Gold-stein, after a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stamford Ridgeway Associates v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- City of Norwich v. Norwalk Wilbert Vault Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Burke v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Cilley v. LamphereSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Arminio v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Strand/BRC Group, LLC v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- High Ridge Real Estate Owner, LLC v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022