Legal Opinion
Birkenshaw v. Haley
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 26, 1974No. Civ. A. 4-71302PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
KAESS, Chief Judge.
The Court is herein confronted with a constitutional attack upon a local ordinance which purports to prohibit “topless”, and “bottomless”, human exposure and “obscene live conduct”. The matter is presently considered in the context of a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff attacks the ordinance on its face.
There is no serious dispute as to the facts. The plaintiff operates a bar' in the Village of Emmett, St. Clair County, Michigan, under a Class B-Hotel License of the Michigan Liquor Control Commission, with a…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Olson v. City of West FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Glen Theatre, Inc. v. Civil City of South BendDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
- Swope v. LubbersDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1983
- Curtis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Curtis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.