Legal Opinion

Curtis v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1982No. 46950-4Published

1Opinion of the Court

97 Wn.2d 59 (1982)

639 P.2d 1370

LEILONI IRENE CURTIS, ET AL, Appellants,

v.

THE CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent.

No. 46950-4.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 11, 1982.

Gilbert H. Levy and Doherty & Levy (Arthur Wells, of counsel), for appellants.

Douglas N. Jewett, City Attorney, and Sean Sheehan, Assistant, for respondent.

DORE, J.

This case examines the constitutionality of the City of Seattle's lewd conduct ordinance and that city's body studio ordinance. We affirm appellants' convictions under these statutes and, in so doing, find no constitutional infirmities.

Appellants are members…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Dolliver; Concurrence · Brachtenbach.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API