Legal Opinion

People v. Gill

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1967No. Docket 2,502PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWise, J.

The defendant, Albert Gill, was charged with altering a bill of exchange 1 and uttering and publishing a forged instrument. 2

At the arraignment on the information, while represented by counsel, the defendant waived the reading of the information and elected to enter a plea of guilty to the first count.

The court thereupon questioned the defendant relative to the offense and was satisfied that according to the defendant’s own words and statements, all the elements of the crime charged were present. The defendant’s statements to the court indicated that he understood the charge lodged against…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BumpusMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. CoatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. SteeleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. People v. QuigleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. People v. KearnsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. StrongMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. LoveMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. RohrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. People v. FergusonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. People v. SzczytkoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API