Department of Children & Family Services v. K.D.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1ConcurrenceAltenbernd, Judge
The court voted to consider this case en banc because recent trial court decisions on appeal in this court reflected differing views of this court’s use of the term “nexus” in termination cases involving two or more children. Examining our own cases we concluded that a new, comprehensive *990opinion was “necessary to maintain uniformity” in our decisions. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.331(a). Although we do not recede from any case today, Chief Judge Silberman’s restatement of this court’s case law will undoubtedly help both the trial courts and this court to maintain uniformity in decisions. As the judge…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In Re Jeffrey R.L.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- Padgett v. Dept. of Health & Rehab. ServicesSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.