Legal Opinion

Staker v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1933No. 23853PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The sole question to be determined is whether an illegitimate, posthumous' child, unacknowledged by its father, should be construed to be a dependent and entitled to compensation under the Ohio Workmen’s Compensation Law.

By virtue of the provisions of Section 35, Article II, of the Ohio Constitution, and Section 1465-68, General Code, only those who are dependents of a deceased employe are entitled to benefits in case of his death. To be a “dependent child” the child must be such as is comprehended and defined by the provision of Section 1465-82, General Code, which reads as follows:

“The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. WhaleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Claim of Bell v. Terry & Tench Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. Murrell v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Scott v. Independent Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
  5. Gritta's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Green v. BurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  2. Lopo v. Union Pacific Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Garner v. B. F. Goodrich Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Bonewit v. WeberOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Green v. WoodardOhio Court of Appeals · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API