Smith v. Glenn
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, Ventura County. Action by Alvin B. Smith, road commissioner, against Catherine Glenn and another. From a judgment in favor of defendants and an order denying a motion for a new trial plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action to abate a nuisance and for damages. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and defendants bad judgment, from which, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.
Defendants are husband and wife, and plaintiff is road commissioner of the Hueneme road district, in Ventura *521county, and as such brought the action. The complaint alleges : That on December 19, 1891, one John Cawelti was the owner of a certain tract of land in said district. On that day he laid out, as part of said land, a strip sixty feet wide, as and for a public highway, and…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Smith v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Smithers v. FitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Whiting v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reed v. HollisterOregon Supreme Court · 1923