Legal Opinion

Brundage v. Johnson

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided November 16, 2022No. 2:22-cv-01670Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * Gary Earl Brundage, Case No. 2:22-cv-01670-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff, 5 SCREENING ORDER 6 v. 7 Matthew Johnson, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Gary Brundage’s request to proceed in forma pauperis 11 (ECF No. 1), filed October 3, 2022. 12 I. In Forma Pauperis Application 13 All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United 14 States must pay a filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s 15 failure to prepay the entire fee only…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Scott Nordstrom v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API