Legal Opinion

Hansen v. MacDonald Meat Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1994No. 92-36631PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action by a bankruptcy trustee to recover money paid to a creditor. The trustee, Thomas Hansen, argues that the payment in question was a preferential transfer and is avoidable under the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 547(b). The bankruptcy court granted the trustee’s motion for summary judgment and avoided the payment. The district court affirmed. The creditor, MacDonald Meat Company, appeals, alleging that the transaction was not a preferential transfer because no “interest of the debtor in property” was involved. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the decision of the district…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. William Michael Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. In Re Bullion Reserve of North America, a California Corporation, Curtis B. Danning, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Theodore P. BozekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Kemp Pacific Fisheries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Sigma Micro Corporation v. healthcentral.comCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Akter v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  4. Santone v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. LisiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API