Legal Opinion

Akter v. Barr

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 18, 2019No. 17-3935Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-3935 Akter v. Barr BIA Poczter, IJ A206 297 955/956 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Victor Paul v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Yueqing Zhang v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Giuli Ivanishvili v. United States Department of Justice & Attorney General GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Manzur v. U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Chun Gao v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API