Legal Opinion
Merchants National Bank v. Randall
Indiana Superior Court
Decided July 1, 1874PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Blair, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.
This is a suit ’brought upon a promissory sole .executed by J. R. Randall .& Co., and payable to the order of the firm ©f Lawyer & Hall, at the First National Bank of -Shelbyville, and by Lawyer & Hall endorsed to said banlc, and by it to plaintiff. The complaint contains two paragraphs.
The first alleges that Randall, and Clark were partners, trading under the name, and style of J. Ü. Randall & Co., and that Lawyer and Hall were partners, doing business under the name of Lawyer & Hall, and that J. ¡B. Randall <& Col made the note payable to order of Lawyer & Hall, at First National Bank of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Slacum v. PomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Aymar v. SheldonNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- Van Staphorst v. PearceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Archer v. HeimanIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Lacy v. Le BruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crill v. City of RomeNew York Supreme Court · 1873
- Farley v. BloodSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1854