Legal Opinion

Rohr v. Crime Victims Compensation Commission

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided July 22, 2019No. 1:16-cv-00162Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CLAUDIA ROHR, CIV. NO. 16-00162 LEK-RT Plaintiff, vs. CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION COMMISSION, OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I; Defendant. ORDER: 1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND 2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT On March 6, 2019, Defendant Crime Victims Compensation Commission of the State of Hawaii (“Defendant” and “Commission”) filed its Second Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defendant’s Motion”), and on March 8, 2019, pro se Plaintiff Claudia Rohr (“Plaintiff”) filed her Motion for Summary Judgment…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API