Legal Opinion
State v. Diaz-Bridges
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 12, 2012No. A-49/50 September Term 2010, 067065Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
34 A.3d 748 (2012)
208 N.J. 544
STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent and Cross-Appellant,
v.
Demetrius DIAZ-BRIDGES, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Respondent.
A-49/50 September Term 2010, 067065
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued September 12, 2011.
Decided January 12, 2012.
Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent.
John K. McNamara, Jr., Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Robert A. Bianchi, Morris County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. McNamara and Paula C. Jordao, Assistant Prosecutor, on the briefs).
Steven A.…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Hoens; Dissent.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.