Legal Opinion
Travelers Insurance v. Maguire
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 17, 1914PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
The defendant Maguire was a tenant in common with others of certain real estate. Upon a petition for partition a commissioner to make partition by sale was appointed by the Probate Court of Suffolk County, who, in accordance with the terms of the warrant, made a sale of the real estate and received a sum in excess of $10,000, for which he is accountable as such commissioner. The court has not yet confirmed the sale, nor made allowance for expenses and services of the commissioner.
The Travelers Insurance Company attached by trustee process in an action against Maguire the share to which he may…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stockbridge v. MixerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Pettibone v. Toledo, Cincinnati, & St. Louis RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Brooks v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
- Chealy v. BrewerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
- Wilder v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Schumann-Heink v. FolsomIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
- McCarthy v. RogersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- BANKERS'MORTG. CO. OF TOPEKA, KAN. v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Blumenthal v. BlumenthalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Hooker v. McLennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.