Legal Opinion

William Adams v. Bill Armontrout and William L. Webster

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1990No. 89-1332PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

William Adams (appellant) appeals from a final order entered in the District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Missouri returning appellant’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition for a writ of habeas corpus because it failed to substantially comply with the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts (1982) (Section 2254 Rules). Appellant argues that the district court should be reversed because his petition substantially complied with the Section 2254 Rules. We affirm the order of the district court.

I

In 1986, appellant was convicted by a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Benny Williams v. Robert Kullman and Robert Abrams, Attorney General, State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. State v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Passic v. StateDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1951
  5. Moore v. SwensonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Steven Keith Hatch v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. William Cox v. Daniel McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Jim Harris, Jr. v. Ian WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  4. Milton v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  5. Harper v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API