Legal Opinion

Schubkegel v. Dunn

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1939No. Civ. 12090PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury in a case arising out of a motor vehicle collision. It is the contention of the plaintiffs that the court erred in giving certain instructions to the jury and in refusing other instructions and in its conduct and demeanor before the jury during the progress of the trial. It is our duty under the circumstances to examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant.

The accident occurred at the intersection of Twenty-fourth and Catalina Streets between an automobile owned by the defendant and a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reeves v. LapintaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Sitkei v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Perumean v. WillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Lorry v. Englander Drayage & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Pearce v. ElbeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parker v. WomackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. O'Kelley-Eccles Co. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Parker v. WomackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. O'Kelley-Eccles Co. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Parker v. WomackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API