Quality Auto Painting Ctr. of Roselle, Inc. v. State Farm Indem. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
This antitrust case requires us to apply the standards announced in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007), to determine whether the allegations of the five complaints before us are sufficient to "nudge[ ] their claims across the line from conceivable to plausible," id. at 570 , 127 S.Ct. at 1974 , so as to state a claim under § 1 of the Sherman Act. Plaintiff-Appellant automobile repair shops (the "Body Shops") claim that the Defendant-Appellee Insurance Companies colluded to lower repair prices by improperly pressuring…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Christopher J. Weiland v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Benny Barmapov v. Guy AmuialCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- L.S. v. Scot PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Crawford's Auto Center, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Sylvan Plowright v. Miami Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- Regions Bank v. Legal Outsource PACourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.