Robey v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Concurrence
LIU, J., Concurring.
As today’s opinion explains, there is an important difference between two kinds of smell-related claims. One is that the detection of a distinctive odor through a police officer’s sense of smell may establish probable cause that a closed container holds contraband. This proposition is well established. (See Johnson v. United States (1948) 333 U.S. 10, 13 [92 L.Ed. 436, 68 S.Ct. 367] [smell of contraband may support probable cause where the officer is “qualified to know the odor, and [the odor] is one sufficiently distinctive to identify a forbidden substance”].) The other,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.