Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Robey v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2013No. S197735Published

1Concurrence

LIU, J., Concurring.

As today’s opinion explains, there is an important difference between two kinds of smell-related claims. One is that the detection of a distinctive odor through a police officer’s sense of smell may establish probable cause that a closed container holds contraband. This proposition is well established. (See Johnson v. United States (1948) 333 U.S. 10, 13 [92 L.Ed. 436, 68 S.Ct. 367] [smell of contraband may support probable cause where the officer is “qualified to know the odor, and [the odor] is one sufficiently distinctive to identify a forbidden substance”].) The other,…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API