Legal Opinion

United States v. Ballard

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1981No. Nos. 79-5268, 79-5506 and 80-5752PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge:

The five appellants in these consolidated cases have been convicted in jury trials of conspiracy and mail fraud violations in connection with oil transactions that occurred in 1973-74 while the Federal Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act was in effect. Briefly, we hold that the theory upon which the appellants were successfully prosecuted was incorrect as a matter of law; based upon the evidence presented, we reverse the convictions of four of the appellants and remand the case involving the remaining one.

I. The Facts

The underlying facts in these cases are rather…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Franklin Delano GipsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. MandelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Jerry R. BohonusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Kenneth O. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. John Von BartaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. G. Cecil Hartley, Travis Dell and Treasure Isle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Joseph M. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. LemireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. RybickiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API