Lee v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentAndrews, Judge
For the reasons expressed herein, I would dismiss these appeals without prejudice and remand them to the trial court to determine whether they have been abandoned.
Since these appellants elected to proceed pro se, and there is no claim that any of them was deprived of the right to be effectively represented by counsel on appeal, neither the holding nor the spirit of *491Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U. S. 387 (105 SC 830, 83 LE2d 821) (1985), requires that they be heard on the merits.1 In Evitts v. Lucey the U. S. Supreme Court found that the due process clause guarantees a criminal defendant effective…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Huguley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.