Legal Opinion

Ansul, Inc. v. Employers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 27, 2012No. 2011AP2596PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMangerson, J.

¶ 1. Between October 1969 and February 1980, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's & London Market Insurance Companies ("Lloyd's") supplied Ansul, Inc. and Tyco International (US), Inc. ("Ansul") with nine excess policies with varying coverage dates. From the 1950s to 1977, Ansul caused severe environmental damage by contaminating groundwater near the Menominee River with substantial quantities of arsenic. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources ("DNR") became involved in the early 1970s, and in 1981 ordered Ansul to construct a groundwater treatment system that operated until 1986, at a cost…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Bradley Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. RTE Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Gerrard Realty Corp. v. American States InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AulCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
  2. Welton Enterprises, Inc. v. Cincinnati InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2015
  3. CNH Industrial America LLC v. American Casualty Company of Reading PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
  4. Old Republic Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API