Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Woods

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1986PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JERRY SCOTT, Special Justice.

In the context of the sales and use tax statutes, this case presents an issue of first impression in Tennessee. The question is whether preprinted advertising supplements inserted in a newspaper are part of the newspaper. The plaintiff contends that they are and that they are therefore exempt from the use tax, pursuant to TCA § 67-6-329(a)(3). The Chancellor held that the supplements are not part of the newspaper and thus subject to the use tax. In its first issue, Sears contends this was error.

Sears, Roebuck & Company is a New York corporation which…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Kahn v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Minnesota v. BlasiusSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Caldor, Inc. v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Daily Record Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Lowe's Companies, Inc. v. CardwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. JC Penney Co., Inc. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  4. American Cyanamid Co. v. HuddlestonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  5. Drackett Products Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API