Legal Opinion

Bay Ridge Utility District v. 4M Laundry

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided June 19, 1986No. 01-85-0735-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOYT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding damages of $593,164, attorney’s fees, and permanent injunctive relief against appellant, Bay Ridge Utility District (“District”).

Suit was initially brought by 4M Laundry and Robert Moody against the District complaining of a denial of constitutional guarantees under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983, tor-tious interference with business and contractual relations, conspiracy to restrain trade, diminution in land value, and breach of contractual obligations. A settlement of all aspects of the case as pled, except damages, was effected by an…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Robertson v. WegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. White v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Lower Colorado River Authority v. City of San MarcosTexas Supreme Court · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Loyd v. ECO Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  3. Patel v. City of Everman, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2004
  4. Graco Robotics, Inc. v. Oaklawn Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
  5. State v. Oakley, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API