Legal Opinion

State v. Hackett

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 18, 1972No. 55334PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Chief Justice.

Defendant appeals following plea of guilty and sentence for receiving stolen property, worth over $20, in violation of Code section 712.1. His only assignéd error is: “Defendant’s guilty plea was improperly accepted because, on the record made, the trial court did not sufficiently ascertain defendant understood the nature of the charge against him.”

In State v. Sisco, Iowa, 169 N.W.2d 542, we cite and discuss in depth the Federal and State cases together with the American Bar Association Standards of Criminal Justice regarding the duty and responsibility of a trial judge…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SiscoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. State v. WillikerArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. LindseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. State v. WeckmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  5. State v. ZacekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brainard v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. State v. ReavesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. State v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Michels v. BrewerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. State v. SargentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API