State v. Sargent
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Chief Justice.
Defendant combines his appeals from judgments on guilty plea convictions for uttering a forged instrument and for assault with intent to inflict great bodily injury. We affirm the judgment in each.
The sole question raised by defendant is whether the trial court complied with the guideline requirements as established by our now oft-cited case of State v. Sisco, Iowa, 169 N.W.2d 542. Stated briefly we therein held that when a guilty plea is entered the trial court must address the accused personally and by interrogation determine whether he understands the charge made, is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. SiscoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- State v. ChristensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- State v. BledsoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- State v. MehuysSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- State v. HackettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brainard v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- State v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- State v. ReppertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- State v. WattsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.