Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Bandini Petroleum Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1930No. Docket No. 6076PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, Acting P. J.

The respondent as a stockholder of the appellant. corporation made demand upon its president and secretary for permission to inspect its books and records, which was denied. He thereupon petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate requiring submission of the same to such inspection, which, after trial, was granted. This is an appeal by the defendant corporation and its' directors, who were joined in the original proceeding.

The refusal of the books was sought to be justified by asserted ulterior motives of respondent in his desire for an examination of the corporate records and was…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Private Investors, Inc. v. Homestake Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Fowler v. Golden Pacific Bancorp.California Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API