Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Dufault

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1943No. 28821PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained while working for the defendant in a hop kiln. In his amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that he was employed by defendant during the month of August, 1940; that, as a part of his duties, he assisted in moving hops from the drying room and dumping them in a bin in an adjoining room; that his work was done with large shovels or scoops, provided for that purpose, which were filled with hops in the drying room and pushed by the operator over a wooden tramway and dumped into open bins alongside; that the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Jacobs v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Jennings v. Tacoma Railway & Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Olson v. McMurray Cedar Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Cronin v. Columbian Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Walsh v. West Coast Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Shultes v. HalpinWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Siragusa v. Swedish HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Myers v. Little Church by the Side of the RoadWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Guy v. Northwest Bible CollegeWashington Supreme Court · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API