Floyd v. Thurman

Jordan, Justice.

Ivey Floyd appeals from the verdict and judgment in favor of Betty and Norman Thurman, and Boyce Thurman, as vouchee, in Floyd’s action for injunction and damages based on alleged continuing trespass on land.

1. The real issue between the parties was the location of the boundary line between their properties. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict in favor of the appellees.

2. The jury’s verdict was as follows: "We the jury find in favor of the defendants.” The judgment described the boundary line between the properties according to an attached plat, and incorporated…