Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Brown

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1928No. 6114PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. The verdict is to be construed in connection with the pleadings, the evidence, and the charge of the court. Harvey v. Head, 68 Ga. 247. Three plaintiffs were suing jointly to recover the land, and the jury found for one of the plaintiffs alone. It appears from the charge that the jury, having had the case under consideration, returned to the jury-box, and the foreman asked the court the following question: “If the jury should find in favor of one of the plaintiffs, what would become of the other interest?” Whereupon the court charged as follows: “If the jury should return a verdict in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nathans v. ArkwrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  2. Wood v. Milly McGuire's ChildrenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  3. Settle v. AlisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
  4. Harris v. CannonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  5. Harvey v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Haughton v. JudsenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Powell v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Gough v. GoughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Jackson v. Riviera Development Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Minor v. RayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API